Editorial Policies
1. Allegations of misconduct
Indian Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Research (INDJCPR) resolves all the allegations and research misconduct on publication ethics and publication malpractice. We follow the code of conduct and best publication practices in scientific publication and adhere to the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (IJCME).
- Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. Submitting the same paper to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing practice.
- Submitting or releasing someone else hypothesis or idea, stealing content and research work is an abuse of the original creator’s work and is considered to be unethical.
- Research misconduct is considered to be fabrication and plagiarism which does not include errors while writing by the author or differences in thoughts of the co-authors.
- Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes at any point in time if the author(s) discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in the submitted manuscript the corresponding authors will be asked to provide an explanation and evidence if required.
- If the author of the reported article accepts the misconduct complaint, the editorial office will take action depending on the situation.
- After the article publication article gets reported of any misconduct than an erratum or retraction may be necessary to remedy the situation.
- If the misconduct is reported during the review process, the review process may continue, with the author(s) making the relevant changes.
- Non-reporting of observed misconduct, and covering up suspected research misconduct by others is also considered to be unethical.
Our team will definitely take necessary action for any reported allegations and research misconduct.
Retraction Policy
International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering & Technology will do retraction of articles when there are significant errors, Ethical concerns and fraudulent data in the published work. Retractions are a way for journals to maintain the integrity of the scientific record. This can happen for many reasons like plagiarism, falsification of data, Ethical violations, multiple submissions of articles and authorship issues, etc.
Every retraction issued will lead to publication for providing a valid reason for it or sometimes an
author explanation is needed as well and we follow the COPE Retraction guidelines. Please contact
[email protected] for such cases.
Erratum
It is a small error or mistake, typically one found in a printed work after it has been published. These errors are specific errors such as typos, formatting, graphical changes, or spelling mistakes, grammatical errors etc but do not alter the original findings of the research. Erratum occurs when the publishers make mistakes instead of the authors, thus there is no fee associated with them for the author. It is given by the editor production team and mistakes will be underlined and will be mentioned in a separate section at the end of the print copy if the errors will be notified under a specific time period.
Corrigendum
These errors which is found in printed work after the publishing of the manuscript. These errors are specific errors such as Spelling errors, changes in the author's affiliation, documentation or any legal changes, requests for more authors, content addition and omissions of information, etc. which are associated with authors. If these changes are minor then can be rectified and the article will be printed in another issue with correction if major errors are there will lead to some costing and proper discussion or investigation if required and will be published in other print copies after correction.
2. Authorship and contributorship
The concept of authorship is understood in such a way that each author of the authorship of the
manuscript contributed to the research, in a certain part. In the event of doubts on the part of the
editors, which may be based on the inconsistency of the content of the manuscript, the
competences of one of the authors in the field of scientific interests, the editors can request from
the author team in a separate document data with the distribution of the contribution to the
research and preparation of the manuscript, with a separate emphasis on the author's
contribution , about which doubts arose.
An author-correspondent is selected from the composition of the author's team, who interacts
with the editorial office. He is responsible for turning the manuscript into an article and its
subsequent publication, as well as at the stage after the publication of the article, if such a need
arises. If there is a reasoned necessity on the part of the authors to remove or add co-authors, or
to change the order of authors, such changes after submission of the manuscript are possible
with the approval of the corresponding author.
The authorship identification process also involves preventing the appearance of ghost authors
and guest authors as part of the author’s team.
3. Complaints and appeals
The following procedure is applicable to appeals of editorial judgements, grievances over
procedural errors, such as protracted delays in handling papers, and grievances regarding
publication ethics.
The Editor-in-Chief(s) responsible for the journal and/or the Editor who handled the paper should
handle the complaint in the first instance.
Send a message to the publisher’s contact at [email protected] if they are the target of
the complaint.
Complaints within a year of the original publication date will be considered about any published
items. Authors are requested to send any concerns to the editorial office by email
at [email protected] along with their justifications.
4. Conflicts of interest/competing interests
indjcpr’s Conflict of Interest policy is based on the COPE’s definition and guidelines:
‘Conflicts of interest comprise those which may not be fully apparent and which may influence the
judgment of author, reviewers, and editors. They have been described as those which, when revealed
later, would make a reasonable reader feel misled or deceived. They may be personal, commercial,
political, academic or financial.
“Financial” interests may include employment, research funding, stock or share ownership, payment
for lectures or travel, consultancies and company support for staff.’
https://publicationethics.org/guidance?f%5B0%5D=topics%3A28
Responsibilities of Participants
Authors
Authors are responsible for reporting any financial Conflict of Interest related to their research. In additional to financial COI other types of competing interests like personal relationships, academic commitments, institutional obligations etc., which might affect the outcome of their work. All authors should fill the declaration form completely and submit it along with the article.
Journals / Publisher action:
- The statement of conflict of interest should be mentioned after the acknowledgement section in each article
- If there are no conflicts, the Disclosures section should include the following statement: “The authors declare no conflicts of interest.”
Reviewers
Reviewers should declare all potential competing or conflicting interests. It includes personal, financial, intellectual, professional, political or religious in nature. It will also include employed in the same institution as any of the authors or have been recent (e.g., within the past 3 years), close collaborators or joint grant holders.
Journals / Publisher action
Reviewers should be asked if they have a COI with the content or authors of a manuscript. If they do, they should be removed from the review process.
Editors
Editors should not make any editorial decisions if they have or a close family member has a financial COI It will also include political/religious COI or personal COI with respect to the authors or their work COI also includes if the article is submitted from their own institution. For articles submitted by editors to same journal, it should be handled by another member of Editorial Board.
Journals / Publisher action:
Editors who make final decisions about manuscripts should recuse themselves from editorial decisions if they have conflicts of interest or relationships that pose potential conflicts related to articles under consideration
5. Data and reproducibility
It is normal to present the results of the author’s research in the conference proceedings
regardless of whether the paper was presented, accepted or published. Indeed, this is common
practice in many fields. In general, copyright law applies to the original expression of ideas, it
may restrict an author from distributing a paper in a conference proceedings, it does not prohibit
an author from creating a new presentation using ideas from this manuscript. The journal would
do well to explain what the authors mean by the notion of “full text”.
It would be prudent if authors did not share an unpublished manuscript with the conference
committee to prevent erroneous duplicate publication. Authors should also consider what
materials, figures, tables, etc. they would be happy to share before publication and in what
format.
It would also be good practice for authors to indicate in the paper that the results were presented
in part (or in full) in conference proceedings.
6. Ethical oversight
According to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), ethical oversight should include, but is not
limited to, policies fee on consent to publication, publication on vulnerable populations, ethical
conduct of research using animals, ethical conduct of research using human subjects, handling
confidential data and ethical business/marketing practices.
For studies involving data relating to human or animal experimental investigations, appropriate
institutional review board approval is required and should be described within the article. For
investigations involving human subjects, authors should explain how informed consent was obtained
from the participants involved. Patients have a right to privacy that should not be infringed without
informed consent. Identifying information should not be included unless the information is essential for
scientific purposes and the patient (or parent or legal guardian) gives written informed consent for
publication. When informed consent has been obtained it should be indicated in the manuscript. In
attempting to maintain patient anonymity, identifying details should be omitted where they are not
essential. However, patient data should never be amended or falsified. Informed consent should be
obtained whenever there is any doubt that anonymity can be assured.
Ethics approval for all studies must be obtained before the research is conducted. Authors must be
prepared to provide further information to the journal editorial office upon request
7. Intellectual property
The Article Processing Charge (APC) allows indjcpr to provide open access to all the articles it
publishes. The fee is set at a minimal possible level to ensure the inclusivity of submissions. It covers
the publishing services provided by indjcpr and allows for its continued operations.
The fee covers the following services:
Online tools for editors and authors
Articles’ production, secure hosting, and dissemination
Abstracting and indexing
Customer support
The fee is payable upon the acceptance of a paper for publication. The INR1400/USD 60 fee (does
not include VAT or local taxes) must be paid by the authors, their institution, or funder before the
paper is made publicly available. Authors whose papers get accepted for publishing will be notified of
the approval and the outstanding payment. Please note that papers will not be published until the
APC is paid.
APC can be paid via a credit card using indjcpr’s via a bank transfer/Razorpay Payment Gateway,
in which case the author must request the invoice and arrange for the payment within 30 days
following the paper’s publication approval.
The author publishes in indjcpr agrees to the following terms:
The journal allows the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allows the authors to
retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first
publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License.
Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution
of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a
book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on
their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as
well as earlier and greater citation of published work. International Journal of Scientific Research in
Engineering & Technology (indjcpr) is (Online) (indjcpr). (E-ISSN: Applied) is licensed under
a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes
were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor
endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally
restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
All papers will be published with DOI Identifier
Duplicate Submission
Authors should not submit the same manuscript, in the same or different languages, simultaneously to more than one journal. The rationale for this standard is the potential for disagreement when two (or more) journals claim the right to publish a manuscript that has been submitted simultaneously to more than one journal, and the possibility that two or more journals will unknowingly and unnecessarily undertake the work of peer review, edit the same manuscript, and publish the same article
Duplicate and Prior Publication
Duplicate publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published,
without clear, visible reference to the previous publication. Prior publication may include release of
information in the public domain.
Readers of journal deserve to be able to trust that what they are reading is original unless there is a
clear statement that the author and editor are intentionally republishing an article (which might be
considered for historic or landmark papers, for example). The bases of this position are international
copyright laws, ethical conduct, and cost-effective use of resources. Duplicate publication of original
research is particularly problematic because it can result in inadvertent double-counting of data or
inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study, which distorts the available evidence.
When authors submit a manuscript reporting work that has already been reported in large part in a
published article or is contained in or closely related to another paper that has been submitted or
accepted for publication elsewhere, the letter of submission should clearly say so and the authors
should provide copies of the related material to help the editor decide how to handle the submission.
Authors who choose to post their work on a preprint server should choose one that clearly identifies
preprints as not peer-reviewed work and includes disclosures of authors’ relationships and activities. It
is the author’s responsibility to inform a journal if the work has been previously posted on a preprint
server.
8. Peer review processes
The Indian Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Research (INDJCPR) is having
ISSN NO: Applied (Online), Bi-monthly international journal for publication of new ideas founded
by academicians, educationist, engineers and corporate people. The research results and FDRP
advancement are all aspects of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering & Technology and
various engineering disciplines, etc. indjcpr is a scholarly open access, Single Peer Review Journal
which helps to academic person as well as student community. indjcpr provides the academic
community and industry for the submission of original research and applications related to Various
Engineering discipline and Advanced Technologies by FDRP Publications, Tamilnadu, India
since year 2020
Reviewers play a central role in scholarly publishing. indjcpr uses Single peer review process,
which means that both the reviewer(s) and author(s) identities are concealed from the reviewer(s),
and vice versa, throughout the review process. This means that the reviewer(s) of the paper won’t get
to know the identity of the author(s), and the author(s) won’t get to know the identity of the
reviewer(s). Peer review helps validate research, establish a method by which it can be evaluated,
and increase networking possibilities within research communities. Despite criticisms, peer review is
still the only widely accepted method for research validation.
All submitted papers will be reviewed by Single peer review process which may take minimum 01 to
03 weeks from the date of submission. We are advising to all the author(s), do not submit same
paper to the multiple journals. You should wait for review status of paper.
indjcpr is committed to prompt evaluation and publication of fully accepted papers. To maintain a
high-quality publication, all submissions undergo a rigorous review process. Characteristics of the
peer review process are as follows:
Simultaneous submissions of the same manuscript to different journals will not be tolerated.
Manuscripts with contents outside the scope will not be considered for review.
Papers will be refereed by at least 3 or 4 experts (reviewers) as suggested by the editorial board in
which 01 from India and rest 02 or 03 from overseas.
In addition, Editors will have the option of seeking additional reviews when needed.
Authors will be informed when Editors decide further review is required. All publication decisions are
made by the journal’s Editors-in-Chief on the basis of the referees’ reports (reviewers report).
Authors of papers that are not accepted are notified promptly.
All submitted manuscripts are treated as confidential documents. All submitted papers will be
reviewed by double blind review process.
All manuscripts submitted for publication in indjcpr cross-checked for plagiarism software.
Manuscripts found to be plagiarized during initial stages of review are out-rightly rejected and not
considered for publication in the journal.
In case if a manuscript is found to be plagiarized after publication, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct
preliminary investigation, may be with the help of a suitable committee constituted for the purpose. If
the manuscript is found to be plagiarized beyond the acceptable limits, the journal will contact the
author’s Institute / College / University and Funding Agency, if any.
9. Post-publication discussions and corrections
indjcpr allows post-publication discussion on the journal’s website, through emails to the editor-in-chief. indjcpr has mechanisms for correcting, revising, or retracting articles after publication.
Correction Policy
Erratum is an error that affects the accuracy of the published paper, and the reputation of the authors. Errata are published as distinct articles. indjcpr publishes errata in the case of a serious mistake or a factual error or omission in the methods, results, or conclusions. To warrant an erratum, the scientific error must be serious enough to affect the scientific content of the article and interpretation of results.
Cases that raise an erratum:
- A figure or table was not explained and mentioned correctly;
- A figure or table was missed out;
- Incorrect results were included in a table;
- An author accidentally is missed out.
A notice of correction will be issued by indjcpr to the article and correct considerable errors that appear in online articles when these errors considerably affect the content or understanding of the work reported (e.g., error in data presentation) or when the error affects the publication’s metadata (e.g., misspelling of an author’s name). In these cases, indjcpr will publish a correction that will be linked to the original article. Furthermore, indjcpr assumes authors inform the editorial office of any errors they have observed (or have been informed of) in their article once published.
Removal of Published Content:
In extraordinary situations, indjcpr reserves the right to remove a paper from its website. This happens when:
- indjcpr is advised that content is libelous that contains false information about a method or a researcher ;
- Infringes a third party’s intellectual property right, right to privacy, or another legal right;
- It causes an immediate and serious risk to safety and integrity if acted upon.
Addenda
An addendum is a notification to add information to a published paper. It should be noted that the supplements do not contradict the original publication and are not used to fix the error. For the errors, indjcpr will publish a correction notice. Actually, if the author needs to update or add some key information then, they can publish an addendum. According to the indjcpr policies, the addenda may be peer- reviewed and are normally subject to oversight by the editor of the research article
10. Research ethics
The Indian Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Research (INDJCPR) is having ISSN NO: Applied (Online), Triannual international journal is completely open access. All articles can be downloaded free of charge. Open-access publishing usually requires the author or the author’s institution to pay for the publication. These fees are termed Article Processing Charges (APCs) which include the cost of peer-reviewing, editing, publishing, maintaining, and archiving articles, and allow immediate access to the full-text versions of the articles. Thus, we must charge authors an APC.