Loading...

Please wait while we retrieve your documents

[email protected] +91 9840521421 Scholarly Open Access, Peer-reviewed, Refereed Journal ISSN Applied Since 2026
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. 2026
  4. Vol. 1 Issue 2
  5. Article
Original Article

Dr. Sodhi's Model of Intelligence-An Empirically Validated Unified Software-Hardware Architecture across Biological and Artificial Intelligence

  • Paper ID 12
  • Volume 1, Issue 2
  • Pages: 48-61
  • Published Online: May-August 2026
  • 324 Views
Open Access Peer Reviewed

Authors

  • Dr. Nitnem Singh Sodhi1

1 Doctorate (Hon.) in Neuropsychology, Fellowship-trained in Clinical Psychiatry Ex-Medical Specialist (Psychologist) at Indian Air Force and presently at Apollo Clinics, and Independent Researcher based in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Article Information

DOI
No Doi
Published Online
May-August 2026
Pages
48-61
Article Type
Original Article
Check for updates
check update

References

1. Nitnem Singh Sodhi. The Unimind Metamodel & Therapy - An Unified Functional Framework of Mind that Explains All Its Faculties and
Provides a Novel Treatment Methodology for Mental Disorders. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering
Technology. 2020;8(4):399-405. doi:10.22214/ijraset.2020.4063.
2. Nitnem Singh Sodhi. The Unibrain Theory - An Unified Functional Architecture of the Brain Which Explains How the Brain Encodes,
Stores and Processes Information, Explains Consciousness and the Function of Sleep and Dreams. International Journal for Research in
Applied Science and Engineering Technology. 2020;8(5):1885-1888. doi:10.22214/ijraset.2020.5304.
3. Dr. Nitnem Singh Sodhi, “The Unified Architecture of Neuropsychology-A Comprehensive Review of the Unibrain Theory and the
Unimind Metamodel with Contemporary Empirical Evidence”, Indian Journal of Clinical and Medical Research, Volume 01, Issue 02,
May-August 2026, PP: 22-29.
4. Dr. Nitnem Singh Sodhi, “The Unimind-Unibrain Double-Convergence Thesis: Why Major Artificial-Intelligence Architectures Tend
Toward the Same Software-Hardware Metamodel Emerging from Contemporary Neuroscience”, Indian Journal of Clinical and Medical
Research, Volume 01, Issue 02, May-August 2026, PP: 34-47. Journal article.
5. Marr D. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: WH
Freeman; 1982.
6. Legg S, Hutter M. Universal intelligence: a definition of machine intelligence. Minds and Machines. 2007;17:391-444.
doi:10.1007/s11023-007-9079-x.
7. Chollet F. On the measure of intelligence. arXiv:1911.01547. 2019.
8. Newell A. Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1990.
9. Anderson JR, Bothell D, Byrne MD, Douglass S, Lebiere C, Qin Y. An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review.
2004;111(4):1036-1060. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1036.
10. Laird JE, Lebiere C, Rosenbloom PS. A Standard Model of the Mind: toward a common computational framework across artificial
intelligence, cognitive science, neuroscience, and robotics. AI Magazine. 2017;38(4):13-26. doi:10.1609/aimag.v38i4.2744.
11. Friston K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2010;11(2):127-138. doi:10.1038/nrn2787.
12. Clark A. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
2013;36(3):181-204. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000477.
13. LeCun Y. A Path Towards Autonomous Machine Intelligence. Version 0.9.2. OpenReview; 2022. OpenReview PDF.
14. Vyas S, Golub MD, Sussillo D, Shenoy KV. Computation through neural population dynamics. Annual Review of Neuroscience.
2020;43:249-275. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-092619-094115.15. La Camera G, Fontanini A, Mazzucato L. Cortical computations via metastable activity. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2019;58:37-45.
doi:10.1016/j.conb.2019.06.007.
16. Pang JC, Aquino KM, Oldehinkel M, Robinson PA, Fulcher BD, Breakspear M, et al. Geometric constraints on human brain function.
Nature. 2023;618:566-574. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06098-1.
17. Gidon A, Zolnik TA, Fidzinski P, Bolduan F, Papoutsi A, Poirazi P, et al. Dendritic action potentials and computation in human layer 2/3
cortical neurons. Science. 2020;367(6473):83-87. doi:10.1126/science.aax6239.
18. Beniaguev D, Segev I, London M. Single cortical neurons as deep artificial neural networks. Neuron. 2021;109(17):2727-2739.e3.
doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.07.002.
19. Tolman EC. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review. 1948;55(4):189-208. doi:10.1037/h0061626.
20. Behrens TEJ, Muller TH, Whittington JCR, Mark S, Baram AB, Stachenfeld KL, et al. What is a cognitive map? Organizing knowledge
for flexible behavior. Neuron. 2018;100(2):490-509. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.002.
21. Constantinescu AO, O’Reilly JX, Behrens TEJ. Organizing conceptual knowledge in humans with a gridlike code. Science.
2016;352(6292):1464-1468. doi:10.1126/science.aaf0941.
22. Whittington JCR, Muller TH, Mark S, Chen G, Barry C, Burgess N, et al. The Tolman-Eichenbaum Machine: unifying space and relational
memory through generalization in the hippocampal formation. Cell. 2020;183(5):1249-1263.e23. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.024.
23. Rao RPN, Ballard DH. Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects.
Nature Neuroscience. 1999;2(1):79-87. doi:10.1038/4580.
24. Desimone R, Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 1995;18:193-222.
doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205.
25. Schacter DL, Addis DR. The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2007;362(1481):773-786. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2087.
26. Schultz W. Dopamine reward prediction-error signalling: a two-component response. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2016;17(3):183-195.
doi:10.1038/nrn.2015.26.
27. Shine JM, Muller EJ, Munn B, Cabral J, Moran RJ, Breakspear M. Computational models link cellular mechanisms of neuromodulation to
large-scale neural dynamics. Nature Neuroscience. 2021;24(6):765-776. doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00824-6.
28. Barrett LF. The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and
Affective Neuroscience. 2017;12(1):1-23. doi:10.1093/scan/nsw154.
29. Tononi G, Cirelli C. Sleep and the price of plasticity: from synaptic and cellular homeostasis to memory consolidation and integration.
Neuron. 2014;81(1):12-34. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.025.
30. de Vivo L, Bellesi M, Marshall W, Bushong EA, Ellisman MH, Tononi G, et al. Ultrastructural evidence for synaptic scaling across the
wake-sleep cycle. Science. 2017;355(6324):507-510. doi:10.1126/science.aah5982.
31. Klinzing JG, Niethard N, Born J. Mechanisms of systems memory consolidation during sleep. Nature Neuroscience. 2019;22(10):1598-
1610. doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0467-3.
32. McCulloch WS, Pitts W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 1943;5:115-
133. doi:10.1007/BF02478259.
33. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature. 1986;323(6088):533-536.
doi:10.1038/323533a0.
34. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521(7553):436-444. doi:10.1038/nature14539.
35. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, et al. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems. 2017;30:5998-6008.
36. Battaglia PW, Hamrick JB, Bapst V, Sanchez-Gonzalez A, Zambaldi V, Malinowski M, et al. Relational inductive biases, deep learning,
and graph networks. arXiv:1806.01261. 2018.
37. Lewis P, Perez E, Piktus A, Petroni F, Karpukhin V, Goyal N, et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks.
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2020;33:9459-9474.
38. Graves A, Wayne G, Danihelka I. Neural Turing Machines. arXiv:1410.5401. 2014.
39. Shazeer N, Mirhoseini A, Maziarz K, Davis A, Le Q, Hinton G, et al. Outrageously large neural networks: the sparsely-gated mixture-of-
experts layer. International Conference on Learning Representations. 2017.
40. Fedus W, Zoph B, Shazeer N. Switch Transformers: scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity. Journal of
Machine Learning Research. 2022;23(120):1-39.
41. Driess D, Xia F, Sajjadi MSM, Lynch C, Chowdhery A, Ichter B, et al. PaLM-E: an embodied multimodal language model. Proceedings
of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2023;202:8469-8488.
42. Trinh TH, Wu Y, Le QV, He H, Luong T. Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations. Nature. 2024;625(7995):476-482.
doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06747-5.
43. Hafner D, Pasukonis J, Ba J, Lillicrap T. Mastering diverse control tasks through world models. Nature. 2025;640(8059):647-653.
doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08744-2.
44. Schrittwieser J, Antonoglou I, Hubert T, Simonyan K, Sifre L, Schmitt S, et al. Mastering Atari, Go, chess and shogi by planning with a
learned model. Nature. 2020;588(7839):604-609. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-03051-4.
45. Kirkpatrick J, Pascanu R, Rabinowitz N, Veness J, Desjardins G, Rusu AA, et al. Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2017;114(13):3521-3526. doi:10.1073/pnas.1611835114.
46. Chavlis S, Poirazi P. Dendrites endow artificial neural networks with accurate, robust and parameter-efficient learning. Nature
Communications. 2025;16(1):943. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56297-9.
47. Modha DS, Akopyan F, Andreopoulos A, Appuswamy R, Arthur J, Cassidy A, et al. Neural inference at the frontier of energy, space, and
time. Science. 2023;382(6668):329-335. doi:10.1126/science.adh1174.
48. Davies M, Wild A, Orchard G, Sandamirskaya Y, Guerra GA, Joshi P, et al. Advancing neuromorphic computing with Loihi: a survey of
results and outlook. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2021;109(5):911-934. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2021.3067593.
49. Dr. Nitnem Singh Sodhi, “Introducing Software Neurotechnology for Artificial Intelligence”, Indian Journal of Computer Science and
Technology, Volume 05, Issue 02 (May-August 2026), PP: 819-827.
APC No fee to publish

Peer-reviewed open accessNo submission fees, publication fees or page charges Peer-reviewed open accessNo publication fees No publication fees

  • CrossRef DOI
  • ISSN Applied
  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Plagiarism Checked
  • Google Scholar
Submit Paper