Loading...

Please wait while we retrieve your documents

ARCHIVES

Review Article

Racial Disparities in Access to PI3K Inhibitors Despite Comparable Mutation Burden: Addressing Data Gaps in Early-Onset and Rare Cancers

Kavya D1 Dr. Prithvi Shankar2

1 PhD Scholar, Faculty of medical biochemistry, Adichunchanagiri University, B G Nagara, India. 2 Professor and Head, Department of biochemistry, BGS Medical College and Hospital Nagnur, Adichunchanagiri University, India.

Published Online: January-April 2026

Pages: 01-07

Cite this article

No Doi

Abstract

Precision oncology promises tailored treatment by focusing on the genome; however, racial disparities in access to PI3K inhibitors persist, despite the mutation burden being comparable across racial and ethnic groups. Around 30– 50% of solid tumors have changes in the PI3K pathway, such as PIK3CA hotspot mutations, PTEN loss, and AKT1 activations. However, large genomic databases like The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and MSK-IMPACTdid not have any information on how common these changes are by race or ethnicity.But real-world data show that Black and Hispanic patients are given these inhibitors much less often. This is a problem because there aren't enough data on early-onset cancers (diagnosed at ≤50 years) and rare cancers .The primary cohort had been administered PI3K inhibitors (alpelisib or investigational agents for trial follow-up) within 90 days of the detection of PI3K pathway alteration.We used multivariable logistic regression models to look at differences by race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Other) and by age of onset and the rarity of cancer (NCI rare cancer designations). Covariates included insurance status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, line of therapy, histology, and socioeconomic indicators. Sensitivity analyses looked at different types of mutations (PIK3CA hotspots vs. other changes), where the practice took place (in an academic setting vs. a community setting), and where in the world it took place. A total of 14,293 patients identified abnormalities in the PI3K pathway (31.2%; PIK3CA 72%, PTEN 18%, AKT1 6%, and 4% from other sources), with mutations showing statistical consistency across racial groups (White 31.5%, Black 30.8%, Hispanic 29.9%, Asian 32.1%, Other 30.4%; P=0.42). Overall, the use of PI3K inhibitors was low (8.2% n=1,172), but there were differences: Black patients were 42% less likely to receive them (odds ratio [OR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45- 0.74; P<0.001), Hispanic patients were 35% less likely (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.49-0.86; P=0.003), and Asian patients were 28% less likely (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.52-0.99; P=0.045) than White patients. These differences were still there after adjusting for all individuals (aOR of Black 0.62; 95% CI 0.48-0.80; P<0.001).In the early-onset subgroup (n=4,821; age ≤50; 42% PI3K-modified), disparities were heightened (Black aOR 0.49; 95% CI 0.32-0.75; P=0.001; Hispanic aO0.54; 95% CI 0.34-0.86; P=0.009), with an overall inhibitor usage rate of 4.1%. n the group with rare cancer (n=2,156; 38% altered; e.g., appendiceal, sinonasal, biliary), less than 3% of patients used inhibitors (n=22), and non-White patients had an aOR of 0.31 (95%CI 0.15-0.65; P=0.002). The disparity in CGP-to- therapy utilization was significant across community practices (12% inhibitor use versus 28% academic; P < 0.001), safety-net hospitals (OR 0.41; 95% CI0.32-0.53), and among Medicaid-insured patients (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.28-0.51). Sensitivity analyses validated robustness: PIK3CA hotspot mutations (n=10,293) yielded comparable gaps (Black aOR 0.59), while PTEN/AKT1 mutations generated even more substantial gaps (Black aOR 0.45).Socioeconomic quintile explained 35% of the variation, while residual variances associated with practice type and region persisted. These findings underscore systemic barriers extending beyond biology, including the underutilization of CGP (Black 42% vs. White 67%; P<0.001), trial exclusion (non-White <15% in PI3K baskets), and referral biases, among numerous others. Recommendations for immediate action include making CGP a requirement in community oncology (for example, expanding CMS reimbursement), setting different accrual targets for basket trials (like NCI-MATCH and MyeloMATCH), using real-world evidence analytics to help with regulatory bridging in rare or early- onset cases, and using AI-enhanced EHR tools to keep an eye on equity. To make precision oncology fair, study showed to take action based on data to fill in these gaps so that all patients with mutation can benefit from PI3K inhibitors, no matter their race, age, or how rare they are Clinical trial registration: N/A (retrospective real-world evidence study).

References

  • 1. Samuels Y, et al. Science. 2004;304(5670):554.

  • 2. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Nature. 2012;487(7407):330- 337.

  • 3. André F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(20):1929-1940. (SOLAR-1 trial)

  • 4. Juric D, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(7):620-632. (INAVO120 trial)

  • 5. Zehir A, et al. Nat Med. 2017;23(6):703-713.

  • 6. TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis. Cell. 2018;173(2):407-419.

  • 7. Bychkovsky A, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):e12500.

  • 8. Singleton D, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(5):e2313612.

  • 9. NCCN Guidelines: Breast Cancer. Version 8.2024.

  • 10. ESMO Guidelines: Endometrial Cancer. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(7):707-726.

  • 11. Phipps AI, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(11):1183-1191.

  • 12. Boland PM, et al. JCO Precis Oncol. 2021;5:PO.20.00485.

  • 13. Pietrantonio F, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(27):2437-2446.

  • 14. Dogan S, et al. Mod Pathol. 2019;32(10):1393-1404.

  • 15. Spratt DE, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(2):273-278.

  • 16. Popejoy AB, Fullerton SM. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):157.

  • 17. SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2020. National Cancer Institute. 2023.

  • 18. Unger JM, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(8):970-975.

  • 19. Fruman DA, et al. Cell. 2017;169(1):11-15.

  • 20. Castel P, et al. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(10):819-820.

  • 21. Kandoth C, et al. Nature. 2013;502(7471):423-429.

  • 22. Zehir A, et al. Nat Med. 2017;23(6):703-713.

  • 23. AACR GENIE Consortium. Cancer Discov. 2023;13(7):1527-1538.

  • 24. André F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(20):1929-1940.

  • 25. Juric D, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(7):620-632.

  • 26. Matulonis UA, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):3003.

  • 27. Hyman DM, et al. Cancer Discov. 2021;11(4):936-949.

  • 28. Elosegui-Artola A, et al. Nat Cell Biol. 2020;22(11):1281-1292.

  • 29. Bychkovsky A, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):e12500.

  • 30. Ruiz MP, et al. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;162(2):297-304.

  • 31. Singleton D, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(5):e2313612.

  • 32. Li Y, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(10):1489-1498.

  • 33. Spratt DE, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(2):273-278.

  • 34. Unger JM, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(11):1183-1191.

  • 35. Hanker LC, et al. Cancer Discov. 2020;10(10):1526-1541.

  • 36. Ugai T, et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022;19(5):293-307.

  • 37. Phipps AI, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(11):1183-1191.

  • 38. Malone KE, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(12):875-888.

  • 39. Partridge AH, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):TPS629.

  • 40. Yurgelun MB, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(5):439-445.

  • 41. Pietrantonio F, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(27):2437-2446.

  • 42. Dogan S, et al. Mod Pathol. 2019;32(10):1393-1404.

  • 43. cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics. Accessed Oct 2024.

  • 44. Subbiah V, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(15_suppl):3002.

  • 45. NCI Cancer Moonshot Progress Report. 2023.

  • 46. Muss HB, et al. J Geriatr Oncol. 2022;13(1):1-7.

  • 47. Patel NM, et al. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2021;5(1):77

Citations

Kavya D, Dr. Prithvi Shankar, “Racial Disparities in Access to PI3K Inhibitors Despite Comparable Mutation Burden: Addressing Data Gaps in Early-Onset and Rare Cancers”, Indian Journal of Clinical and Medical Research, Volume 01, Issue 01, January-April 2026, PP: 01-07.

Article Metrics

171
Views
0
Citations
PlumX Metrics PlumX Metrics
Dimension Dimension

Licensing

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Fifth Dimension Research Publication.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.