Loading...

Please wait while we retrieve your documents

ARCHIVES

Year 2026 · Volume 1 · Issue 3

Original Article

Introducing “Neurobiological Vector Space” (𝒩): Why Biological Neurons Store Information as Directional Vectors and How the Mathematics of Artificial Intelligence Governs the Unimind–Unibrain Architecture

Dr. Nitnem Singh Sodhi1
1 Managing Director, Bharat NeuroTech; Mental Health Specialist, Apollo Clinics (Lucknow & Gorakhpur); Ex-Medical Specialist (Psychologist), Indian Air Force; Independent Researcher based in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. Presently learning AI from IIT Kharagpur.

Published Online: September-December 2026

Pages: 20-34

Cite this article

No Doi

Abstract

Background: The Unimind Metamodel (2020) and the Unibrain Theory (2020) introduced a paired software–hardware account of mind and brain, subsequently unified via the Unimind–Unibrain Double-Convergence Thesis and Dr. Sodhi’s Model of Intelligence (2026) into an eleven-component architectural normal form 𝒰 = ⟨R_t, O_t, M_t, A, G_t, P, V, S_t, L, C, H⟩. While prior work demonstrated that biological cognition and modern artificial intelligence (AI) converge on the same functional organization, a foundational mathematical question remained unresolved: whether biological neural circuits and artificial neural architectures also share a common underlying geometry of information encoding and operator calculus. Objective: This paper formulates and proves the structural coherence of the Neurobiological Vector Space (𝒩) Thesis: just as AI stores and manipulates all tokens, concepts, associations, and transformations as vectors and directional trajectories in high-dimensional embedding spaces, biological neurons and neuronal populations store information as baseline-centered vectors, unit directions, and probability distributions within a biological state manifold termed Neurobiological Vector Space (𝒩), over which the core mathematical operations of AI apply directly. Methods / Theoretical Framework: Using differential information geometry, high-dimensional probability (concentration of measure), statistical mechanics of continuous Hopfield associative networks, and dynamical systems theory, each construct of 𝒰 is mapped from its qualitative neuropsychological formulation in the Unimind Metamodel and Unibrain Theory into an explicit mathematical operator on (𝒩, G_t). Results: Seven foundational mathematical correspondences are established in 𝒩: (1) single cortical neurons with nonlinear dendritic arbors act as local multi-subspace directional projectors, while baseline-centered population firing-rate and phase distributions define a Riemannian manifold (𝒩, G_t) in which semantic identity is encoded by unit vector direction ẑ_t = z̃_t / ‖z̃_t‖_𝒩 ∈ 𝕊_𝒩^(N−1) and salience/confidence by norm ‖z̃_t‖_𝒩 and distributional precision Tr(Σ_t^(−1)); (2) multidimensional Unimind objects (O_t) correspond to direct-sum subspace vectors capable of storing M ≥ exp(Nε²/4) quasi-orthogonal concepts via sparse superposition; (3) the Unimind database of associations (M_t) is governed by a synaptic bilinear metric tensor and modern continuous Hopfield free-energy minimization, yielding exact functional equivalence to transformer key–value associative retrieval; (4) Unibrain combinational circuits instantiate the database of algorithms (A) as conditionally routed nonlinear vector fields 𝒯_α: 𝒩 → 𝒩, while attention/filtration (G_t) arises from layer-1 apical prefrontal query vectors q_t interacting with layer-4/5 basal sensory/mnemonic keys k_j under parvalbumin-positive (PV+) divisive normalization (biological softmax/sparsemax); (5) virtual experiencing (P) executes latent transition rollouts and Langevin reverse-diffusion flows along the learned cortical score vector field ∇_z log p_model(z); (6) valuation (V) and personal identity (S_t) operate as neuromodulatory metric-warping fields G_t(ν_t) and an invariant low-rank self-subspace 𝒮_t ⊂ 𝒩; and (7) the Law of Algorithmic Evolution (L) and sleep consolidation (C) execute three-factor outer-product low-rank updates (biological LoRA) followed by offline slow-wave singular-value truncation and REM replay-driven Gram–Schmidt orthogonalization. Conclusion: Biological and artificial intelligence do not merely converge on macro-architectural modules; they execute mathematically isomorphic vector and distributional operations over distinct physical substrates. Formulating neuropsychology and clinical psychiatry within Neurobiological Vector Space (𝒩) provides a quantitative calculus for cognition, Epigenetic Neurochemical Dysregulation (END), Self-Questioning Therapy (SQT), Cognishield, UNETRA, ANSAR, and human–AI cognitive extension under Software Neurotechnology.• Unified Vector-Geometric Bridge: Introduces Neurobiological Vector Space (𝒩) as the exact mathematical bridge uniting the Unimind Metamodel (software), the Unibrain Theory (hardware), and Dr. Sodhi’s Model of Intelligence (𝒰). • The Directional Encoding Axiom: Demonstrates that balanced excitatory–inhibitory (E/I) neural ensembles encode semantic identity in unit vector direction (ẑ_t ∈ 𝕊_𝒩^(N−1)), stimulus salience in vector magnitude (‖z̃_t‖_𝒩), and epistemic certainty in distributional precision (Tr(Σ_t^(−1))).• Exact Biophysical Counterparts of AI Mathematics: Proves that inner products, cosine similarity, softmax attention, sparse dictionary superposition, continuous Hopfield retrieval, Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), and reverse-diffusion generative rollouts emerge naturally from cortical biophysics. • Mathematical Proof of the Unibrain Sleep Hypothesis: Formalizes biological sleep (C) as nuclear-norm Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) rank compression during slow-wave sleep paired with contrastive Gram–Schmidt orthogonalization during REM dreaming. • Quantitative Clinical & Neurotechnological Calculus: Derives explicit vector-space equations for Epigenetic Neurochemical Dysregulation (END), Self-Questioning Therapy (SQT), Cognishield, UNETRA trait geometry, ANSAR probing, and hybrid human–AI coupling (𝒩_bio ⊕ ℰ_AI).

References

  • 1. Sodhi, N. S. (2020). The Unimind Metamodel & Therapy — An Unified Functional Framework of Mind that Explains all its Faculties

  • and Provides a Novel Treatment Methodology for Mental Disorders. International Journal for Research in Applied Science &

  • Engineering Technology (IJRASET), 8(IV), 399–405. doi:10.22214/ijraset.2020.4063

  • 2. Sodhi, N. S. (2020). The Unibrain Theory — An Unified Functional Architecture of the Brain which Explains how the Brain Encodes,

  • Stores & Processes Information, Explains Consciousness and the Function of Sleep and Dreams. International Journal for Research in

  • Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), 8(V), 1885–1888. doi:10.22214/ijraset.2020.5304

  • 3. Sodhi, N. S. (2026). The Unified Architecture of Neuropsychology — A Comprehensive Review of the Unibrain Theory and the Unimind

  • Metamodel with Contemporary Empirical Evidence. Indian Journal of Clinical and Medical Research (INDJCMR), 1(2), 22–29.

  • fdrpjournals.org/indjcmr

  • 4. Sodhi, N. S. (2026). The Unimind–Unibrain Double-Convergence Thesis: Why Major Artificial-Intelligence Architectures Tend Toward

  • the Same Software–Hardware Metamodel Emerging from Contemporary Neuroscience. Indian Journal of Clinical and Medical Research

  • (INDJCMR), 1(2), 34–47. PDF Archive

  • 5. Sodhi, N. S. (2026). Dr. Sodhi’s Model of Intelligence — An Empirically Validated Unified Software–Hardware Architecture across

  • Biological and Artificial Intelligence. Indian Journal of Clinical and Medical Research (INDJCMR), 1(2), 48–61. fdrpjournals.org/indjcmr

  • 6. Sodhi, N. S. (2026). Introducing Software Neurotechnology for Artificial Intelligence. Indian Journal of Computer Science and

  • Technology (INDJCST), 5(2), 819–827. doi:10.59256/indjcst.20260502087

  • 7. Sodhi, N. S. (2026). Introducing Software Neurotechnology for Humans: A Human-Led, AI-Augmented Architecture for Cognitive

  • Extension, Agency, and Planetary Intelligence. Indian Journal of Clinical and Medical Research (INDJCMR), 1(3), 03–16.

  • fdrpjournals.org/indjcmr

  • 8. Sodhi, N. S. (2026). The ‘END’ of Psychiatry: Epigenetic Neurochemical Dysregulation (END) as the Universal Mechanism and

  • Framework for Psychopathology. Indian Journal of Clinical and Medical Research (INDJCMR), 1(2), 11–21. fdrpjournals.org/indjcmr

  • 9. Sodhi, N. S. (2021). COGNISHIELD: A Simple Practical Technique for Instant Spontaneous Treatment of all Possible Psychological

  • Disorders and to Drastically Enhance Cognition by Absolute Conscious Control of Mind. International Journal for Research in Applied

  • Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), 9(VII), 1338–1339. doi:10.22214/ijraset.2021.36618

  • 10. Sodhi, N. S. (2022). Self-Questioning Therapy (SQT): Capable of Removing Individual Thoughts from Mind, To Be Used as First-Aid &

  • Treatment for All Psychological Problems. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET),

  • 10(VI), 3652–3655. doi:10.22214/ijraset.2022.44709

  • 11. Sodhi, N. S. (2022). ANSAR Examination: Neurological Examination Methods to Ascertain Subconscious and Unconscious Reactions

  • of Mind/Brain for any Specific Stimulus or Situation. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology

  • (IJRASET), 10(XI), 94–97. doi:10.22214/ijraset.2022.47219

  • 12. Sodhi, N. S. (2023). Unified Neural Trait Range Assessment (UNETRA): A Complete Neuro-Psychological Personality Classification

  • and Assessment System. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), 11(III), 1245–1266.

  • doi:10.22214/ijraset.2023.49645

  • 13. Sodhi, N. S. (2024). Neuropsychology of Self-Regulation: Attention Control Mechanism for Controlling Thinking and Other Cognitive

  • Processes. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR), 6(2). doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.15551

  • 14. Sodhi, N. S. (2025). Distributed Nervous Systems: A Macro-Level Understanding of Individual and Collective Neuroscience.

  • International Journal of Scientific Research, 14(2), 15–17.

  • 15. McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics,

  • 5, 115–133. doi:10.1007/BF02478259

  • 16. Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review,

  • 65(6), 386–408. doi:10.1037/h0042519

  • 17. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323, 533–536.

  • doi:10.1038/323533a0

  • 18. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521, 436–444. doi:10.1038/nature14539

  • 19. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention Is All You Need.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 30, 5998–6008.

  • 20. Gu, A., & Dao, T. (2024). Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces. Proceedings of the First Conference on

  • Language Modeling, arXiv:2312.00752.

  • 21. Lahoti, A., Li, K. Y., Chen, B., Wang, C., Bick, A., Kolter, J. Z., et al. (2026). Mamba-3: Improved Sequence Modeling Using State Space

  • Principles. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), arXiv:2603.15569.

  • 22. Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., et al. (2020). Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-

  • Intensive NLP Tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 33, 9459–9474.

  • 23. Xu, W., Liang, Z., Mei, K., Gao, H., Tan, J., & Zhang, Y. (2025). A-MEM: Agentic Memory for LLM Agents. Advances in Neural

  • Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 38.

  • 24. Zhang, G., Fu, M., Wang, K., Wan, F., Yu, M., & Yan, S. (2025). G-Memory: Tracing Hierarchical Memory for Multi-Agent Systems.

  • Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 38.

  • 25. Shazeer, N., Mirhoseini, A., Maziarz, K., Davis, A., Le, Q., Hinton, G., & Dean, J. (2017). Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The

  • Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).

  • 26. Fedus, W., Zoph, B., & Shazeer, N. (2022). Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient

  • Sparsity. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23(120), 1–39.

  • 27. Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q. V., & Zhou, D. (2022). Chain-of-Thought Prompting

  • Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 35.

  • 28. Yao, S., Yu, D., Zhao, J., Shafran, I., Griffiths, T. L., Cao, Y., & Narasimhan, K. (2023). Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with

  • Large Language Models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 36.

  • 29. Ho, J., Jain, A., & Abbeel, P. (2020). Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

  • (NeurIPS), 33, 6840–6851.

  • 30. Hafner, D., Pasukonis, J., Ba, J., & Lillicrap, T. (2025). Mastering diverse control tasks through world models. Nature, 640, 647–653.

  • doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08744-2

  • 31. Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Hubert, T., Simonyan, K., Sifre, L., Schmitt, S., et al. (2020). Mastering Atari, Go, chess and shogi by

  • planning with a learned model. Nature, 588, 604–609. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-03051-4

  • 32. Frankle, J., & Carbin, M. (2019). The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks. International Conference

  • on Learning Representations (ICLR).

  • 33. Kadavath, S., Conerly, T., Askell, A., Henighan, T., Drain, D., Perez, E., et al. (2022). Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know.

  • arXiv:2207.05221.

  • 34. Gidon, A., Zolnik, T. A., Fidzinski, P., Bolduan, F., Papoutsi, A., Poirazi, P., et al. (2020). Dendritic action potentials and computation in

  • human layer 2/3 cortical neurons. Science, 367(6473), 83–87. doi:10.1126/science.aax6239

  • 35. Beniaguev, D., Segev, I., & London, M. (2021). Single cortical neurons as deep artificial neural networks. Neuron, 109(17), 2727–2739.e3.

  • doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.07.002

  • 36. Chavlis, S., & Poirazi, P. (2025). Dendrites endow artificial neural networks with accurate, robust and parameter-efficient learning.

  • Nature Communications, 16, 943. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56297-9

  • 37. Vyas, S., Golub, M. D., Sussillo, D., & Shenoy, K. V. (2020). Computation Through Neural Population Dynamics. Annual Review of

  • Neuroscience, 43, 249–275. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-092619-094115

  • 38. Behrens, T. E. J., Muller, T. H., Whittington, J. C. R., Mark, S., Baram, A. B., Stachenfeld, K. L., & Kurth-Nelson, Z. (2018). What Is a

  • Cognitive Map? Organizing Knowledge for Flexible Behavior. Neuron, 100(2), 490–509. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.002

  • 39. Constantinescu, A. O., O’Reilly, J. X., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2016). Organizing conceptual knowledge in humans with a gridlike code.

  • Science, 352(6292), 1464–1468. doi:10.1126/science.aaf0941

  • 40. Rao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptivefield

  • effects. Nature Neuroscience, 2(1), 79–87. doi:10.1038/4580

  • 41. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.

  • doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167

  • 42. Schultz, W. (2016). Dopamine reward prediction-error signalling: a two-component response. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(3), 183–

  • 195. doi:10.1038/nrn.2015.26

  • 43. Tononi, G., & Cirelli, C. (2014). Sleep and the price of plasticity: from synaptic and cellular homeostasis to memory consolidation and

  • integration. Neuron, 81(1), 12–34. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.025

  • 44. de Vivo, L., Bellesi, M., Marshall, W., Bushong, E. A., Ellisman, M. H., Tononi, G., & Cirelli, C. (2017). Ultrastructural evidence for

  • synaptic scaling across the wake–sleep cycle. Science, 355(6324), 507–510. doi:10.1126/science.aah5982

  • 45. Modha, D. S., Akopyan, F., Andreopoulos, A., Appuswamy, R., Arthur, J., Cassidy, A., et al. (2023). Neural inference at the frontier of

  • energy, space, and time. Science, 382(6668), 329–335. doi:10.1126/science.adh1174

  • 46. Davies, M., Wild, A., Orchard, G., Sandamirskaya, Y., Guerra, G. A., Joshi, P., et al. (2021). Advancing Neuromorphic Computing With

  • Loihi: A Survey of Results and Outlook. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(5), 911–934. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2021.3067593

  • 47. Sun, P., Su, Z., Achterberg, J., Indiveri, G., Goodman, D. F. M., & Akarca, D. (2026). Algorithm–hardware co-design of neuromorphic

  • networks with dual memory pathways. Nature Machine Intelligence, 8, 901–912. doi:10.1038/s42256-026-01255-3

  • 48. Zhou, Y., Shah, S., Dey, T., Zhou, Y., Kumar, A., Sriram, S., et al. (2026). Protonic nickelate device networks for spatiotemporal

  • neuromorphic computing. Nature Nanotechnology, 21, 579–587. doi:10.1038/s41565-026-02133-0

Citations

Dr. Nitnem Singh Sodhi, “Introducing “Neurobiological Vector Space” (𝒩): Why Biological Neurons Store Information as Directional Vectors and How the Mathematics of Artificial Intelligence Governs the Unimind–Unibrain Architecture”, Indian Journal of Clinical and Medical Research, Volume 01, Issue 03, September-December 2026, PP: 20-34.

Article Metrics

126
Views
0
Citations
PlumX Metrics PlumX Metrics
Dimension Dimension

Licensing

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Fifth Dimension Research Publication.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.